Reason Magazine

Site Search

A Hopeful Ratio

Members of Congress seem less willing to sponsor costly bills

Once upon a time, sponsoring bills to increase spending was more popular than backing cuts. That seems to be changing.

Since 1991, the ratio of spending-increase bills to spending-cut bills has dropped from 12-to-1 to 5-to-4, according to data from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. In 1992, over 1,000 bills were proposed that would raise spending by more than $1 million; in 1995, there were fewer than 300.

Only around 10 percent of proposed bills ever make it to a full vote, so this trend doesn't necessarily mean Congress will end up spending less. "But that ratio does get reflected in the amending process and in a general pressure to see bills passed," says NTUF Executive Director Paul Hewitt. Hewitt hopes that publicizing the data will have "a shaping effect on the institutional fiscal culture in Congress, making them more reluctant to sponsor spending bills and more willing to sponsor bills that cut spending."

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Send this article to:

More Articles by Brian Doherty

Related Stories (Congress, Government Spending)

  • Obama's Numbers
    The president-elect has promised to make his math add up. Therein lies a glimmer of possibility. Matt Welch (12/1)
  • Lone Star Lessons
    What Texas and Florida can teach big spending states Leonard Gilroy (11/26)
  • What's the Matter With Libertarians?
    Thomas Frank blames the freedom movement for Jack Abramoff and George W. Bush Jesse Walker (11/20)

Latest Articles on Reason Online

LATEST POSTS ON REASON'S HIT & RUN