Sheriff Lott's New Toy
Radley Balko | September 1, 2008, 1:12pm
The Richland County, South Carolina Sheriff's Department (that's them above) just obtained an armored personnel carrier, complete with a belt-fed, .50-cal turreted machine gun. Sheriff Leon Lott has charmingly named the vehicle "The Peacemaker," and insists that using a caliber of ammunition that even the U.S. military is reluctant to use against human targets (it's generally reserved for use against armored vehicles) will "save lives."
Can we call this overkill, yet? Is there any weapon people like Sheriff Lott would consider inappropriate for use against American citizens?
Like most of these military toys obtained by local police departments, the Peacemaker will inevitably be used on drug and gambling raids—that is, to enforce laws against consensual activities. Or, as we're now seeing in Minnesota, perhaps on raids against leftist political activists.
Can't be too careful, you know.
Other Matt | September 2, 2008, 10:46am | #
I live in Sheriff Lott's county, Richland. I'm very familiar with the M-113A2; I used to drive it. It's a fun vehicle.
I don't have a problem with the vehicle. I think it's a ridiculous waste of money, but if they want an APC to transport people I don't particularly care.
What I have a problem with is the weaponry. It's not that it's a 50 cal. That particular round does have a place in the world, typically for long range accurate fire. However, the accuracy is due to the weight of the firearm rather than a function of the round, all the round does is have enough legs to get there. I find it quite an eyebrow raiser to look at it in law enforcement, but I can see a legitimate, though quite limited, role for it, basically punching through steel plate to get at guys like the one that had the armored dozer a few years ago.
What I have a REAL problem with is fully automatic fire, or even select fire, on behalf of law enforcement. You simply cannot keep a full auto on target (the rationale for burst). It's absolutely critical that law enforcement maintain fire discipline. The two are incompatible, philosophically and physically (at least for a 50, a 9mm HK or a good muzzle brake might make a 223 physically compatible).
It would be quite different if this was a rural Texas county straight out of "No Country for Old Men" and subject to armed banditos on hardened jeeps, this is not, apparantly.
Erego, lawyers are going to have a field day with this thing.
Civilians can't own anything comparable to that thing.
I don't know, it would be a Cl 3 license, but I'm sure if you had enough cash someplace, somewhere, you could get one.
pat | September 9, 2008, 8:06pm | #
'DasExperten | September 4, 2008, 3:26am | #
All of you whiny "OMFG police state" liberals need to give it a rest. Yeah it may not look nice but old M113s are lying around everywhere and are probably cheaper than a modern armored car.'
That's that a logical argument for the over saturated Military-Industrial Complex influence in American Politics, as far as, I am concerned. Neocon.
'Also quit calling police officers "Nazi pigs" you bunch of moonbat liberals. Hundreds of officers have died in the line of duty serving this country, and you have the nerve to call them Nazis from your computer chair?'
Yup
'Do you dumbass really think cops wake up in the morning and think "I want to beat somebody's ass"?'
Some certainly do, it's the result of "conditioning mentally and physically", added with a predominance for adrenaline addiction, it turns nicely into Explosive Personality Dissorder, and the result is a person so fried mentally that they may as well be made of pudding.
'No 99% of them want to go to work, get paid, and head home to their families like everybody else.'
A number like that is untrue and unverifiable, placing an arbitrary number on that concept in no way helps your loose emotional rant.
'Somebody has to uphold society's laws and keep this country, or any modern country from falling apart.'
Taking the Masochistic's Role I see. Assuming that we are all in need of an overlord, or else its impossible.
'Somebody'?!
How about "WE All", have to uphold societies laws. Chances are that with the police scaled back, tied in with simple decriminalization of narcotics. You jut saved a lot of money pain and time, and actually disturb the circle of waste and violence.
The police are not working with or without their technology.