Reason Magazine

Site Search

New at Reason

If only the somnolent Mitt Romney was as interesting as his Mormon faith. Jesse Walker prays that his Mormon roots start to shine through and waits for him to spew something wonderfully strange.

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Send this article to:

« Post-Adolescent Power Fantasies | Main | You Can't Handle the 9/11… »

Comments to "New at Reason":

isildur | February 1, 2008, 3:12pm | #

You beat me to the Battlefield: Earth mention. Before I heard that, I thought Romney was a bland stuffed suit; not good for the country as President, but not terrible, either. Just a guy.

But anyone who thinks B:E is anything but garbage packaged in a tasty paranoid cult coating is a nutjob. I'd vote for Huckabee over Romney, after that little revelation.

All cult antics aside, it's not even good sci-fi.

Warty | February 1, 2008, 3:13pm | #

Mitt Romney, he was a candidate
Dum dum dum dum dum

robc | February 1, 2008, 3:20pm | #

If you are going to go with Mormon Sci-Fi as your favorite novel, shouldnt you pick Ender's Game?

Rattlesnake Jake | February 1, 2008, 3:30pm | #

Mormons aren't portrayed in a very good light in Zane Grey's "Riders of the Purple Sage."

Gabe Harris | February 1, 2008, 3:30pm | #

The ecumenical-libertarian. I wonder what he says about the national council of churches?

Al Federber | February 1, 2008, 3:43pm | #

Joseph Smith was a pathological liar.

Justin Raimondo | February 1, 2008, 3:57pm | #

Wonderful article, written with style and grace. Why not do an update on those Mormon-hating prison-founding "reformers"? You could tie it into the anti-Mormon sentiment now directed at Romney.

Pro Libertate | February 1, 2008, 3:59pm | #

Rattlesnake Jake,

Or in A Study in Scarlet.

Allen Smith | February 1, 2008, 4:09pm | #

Surely B:E isn't Romney's favorite novel? I'm a Mormon, just for a little over a year now, and the church is a great church, spiritually. And, a science fiction reader, too. Hubbard was a fair to mediocre science fiction writer who discovered that creating a tax free source of income, the Church of Scientology, made more sense than getting paid pennies a word for psuedo scientific glop.

Helen Mar Kimball | February 1, 2008, 4:14pm | #

You have to love a religion started by a guy so he could have sex with as many teenaged girls as he wanted.

Joseph Smith was not a pathological liar. He was a very well-adjusted, completely sane liar, who lied so he could make money and have sex with teenaged girls.

twv | February 1, 2008, 4:27pm | #

Great article, with lots of "new" (to me) historical information.

But I beg to differ. "Every man a king" is NOT the greatest campaign slogan in American history. There are quite a few that are better. My favorites come from BOTH sides of the race in 1884:

Grover Cleveland: Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, The Continental Liar from the State of Maine

James Blaine: Ma, Ma, Where’s my Pa, Gone to the White House, Ha, Ha, Ha.

Like Henry Clay's misguided "Who is James K. Polk?" Blaine's taunting of Cleveland cut the wrong way for him. But the right way for America.

Cleveland's slogan is one of the best put-downs in American history.

And for those who like double entendres, surely Harding's "Cocks and Cocktails" has to get some nod, no? (Though the actual pro-Prohibition intent was pretty disgusting, especially coming from hard-drinker Harding.)

New World Dan | February 1, 2008, 4:28pm | #

Certainly you can draw some paralells between Joe Smith and Ron Hubbard. Now, given that every Mormon I've ever met has been a model human being (bat shiat crazy religious beliefs aside), it makes me wonder what Scientologists will be like in 100 years.

As I said, every mainstream Mormon I've known (and there have been many) has been in all other respects the very model of a pleasant, polite, friendly and hardworking neighbor. I can't figure out, for the life of me, why anyone would object to Romney being a Mormon. Religion aside, I find it to be a ringing endorsement.

Robert Capozzi | February 1, 2008, 4:35pm | #

I'm of no particular faith, but it seems many of them have been helpful to many, yet I'm sure we can find dysfunction in any of them.

Still, I liked this article, yet there seems to be an undertoe of judgmentalism about it.

"Exaltation," for instance, could be read like some Eastern spiritualities allude to: That "God" is each of us. Is Walker's point to cast aspersions, or inform?

joshua corning | February 1, 2008, 4:42pm | #

SO Reason goes from no coverage about Romney to coverage about his underwear to "This guy isn't salty enough"

Fuck an A.

How about something in the way of how this guy has governed, how he says he will govern and how does that line up with Reason's multiple flavors of libertarianism....

This really is not to much to ask considering how much coverage Clinton, Oboma, and McCain have received.

Walker failed. Can David or Matt please stand up and cover this guy? I would like to know more about him then his underwear and how he tastes with red wine.

Danny | February 1, 2008, 4:55pm | #

Al Federber | February 1, 2008, 3:43pm | #
Joseph Smith was a pathological liar.


So were the "apostles". :-P

Jesse Walker | February 1, 2008, 4:59pm | #

How about something in the way of how this guy has governed, how he says he will govern and how does that line up with Reason's multiple flavors of libertarianism....

Sounds like a story worth writing. But it wasn't what I set out to do, and it isn't really possible to do it within the constraints of our one-page "rant" column.

That said, you can find a brief version of what you're looking for here.

LarryA | February 1, 2008, 5:04pm | #

Walker prays that his Mormon roots start to shine through and waits for him to spew something wonderfully strange.

How about, "Every family should stock a year's supply of food, so we can do away with FEMA." That would get my vote.

Al Federber | February 1, 2008, 5:23pm | #

My wife and I occasionally watch BYU TV, and are always struck by how robotic and repressed the presenters and participants seem -- like they're under great psychological strain.

When I was in High School, about 1968, my humanities class visited a local Mormon Temple, and were shown around by an Elder. We were all standing around the baptismal vat when one of my classmates asked the Elder about the Church's longstanding prejudice against Blacks. This guy told us, with a straight face, that there were documented occasions when Blacks went under the baptismal waters with dark skin and came up with white skin! He was not joking, my friends. We all just looked at each other.

Sys | February 1, 2008, 5:31pm | #

So what is the chlorine content of that baptismal font?

Al Federber | February 1, 2008, 5:32pm | #

I've only known one professional Christian preacher personally, but I knew him from third grade until after college, so I have a pretty good idea what makes him (and I think a lot of the rest of them) tick. My take is that they are green with envy about what Joseph Smith and L. Ron Hubbard managed to pull off, and they'd gleefully go down the same road if they could only catch a break.

Pig Mannix | February 1, 2008, 5:53pm | #

Based on his track-record and his credentials, I'd like to like Romney. Except that I don't, and it has nothing to do with his religion. Mostly, it's because every time I'm ready to support him, he reveals himself to be a royal prick.

YouTube will be his undoing...

brotherben | February 1, 2008, 6:16pm | #

I must say from personal experience, that mormon families out west tended to be the most respectful, organized, charitable and just all around pleasant folks I've been around. Their children were generally well behaved, intelligent, well educated and as they grew up, successful in life. As religions go, I like their interaction with outsiders best.

Douglas Gray | February 1, 2008, 7:05pm | #

Dear Al:

Maybe they put bleach in the baptismal waters. That would explain the black guys coming up white.

Brian Sorgatz | February 1, 2008, 7:12pm | #

I love Jeopardy!. The religion of Ken Jennings can't be all bad.

prolefeed | February 1, 2008, 9:01pm | #

When I was in High School, about 1968, my humanities class visited a local Mormon Temple, and were shown around by an Elder.

Al, did you mean a meetinghouse rather than a Temple? Only LDS members with Temple Recommends are allowed inside Temples, except for a brief open house when a Temple is first dedicated or refurbished.

manaen | February 1, 2008, 9:56pm | #

As a life-long, believing LDS, I found this article a hoot!
.
One quibble: the Church took no action against Sonia Johnson until she started telling people not to talk to the missionaries and to refuse baptism until the Church adopted her views of feminism. Maybe you can understand how the Church of Jesus Christ would have a problem with a member telling people to forego what the Church teaches is a saving ordinance.

R C Dean | February 1, 2008, 11:25pm | #

I must say from personal experience, that mormon families out west tended to be the most respectful, organized, charitable and just all around pleasant folks I've been around. Their children were generally well behaved, intelligent, well educated and as they grew up, successful in life.

I would tend to agree. They tend to be a little insular and standoffish, maybe, but it beats the smarmy nosiness so many Baptists fall prey to.

Dan Clore | February 2, 2008, 3:16am | #

If Mormonism isn't evil, why was Joseph Smith played by Vincent Price?

Someone Who Doesn't Want to Lose His Job | February 2, 2008, 10:18am | #

I have Mormon neighbors (in Virginia) and as has been said by many other posters here, you couldn't ask for a much better set. They tend to be helpful, polite, and quiet (except the kids, but kids pretty much always are into screaming as their number one pastime). Also, since they have the added distinction of being part of a religious minority that's viewed with disdain by the larger Christian population, they don't tend to hassle anyone much about religion.

Al Federber | February 2, 2008, 10:53am | #

I'm uneasy around all religious people. If they'll believe that crap, what else might they be persuaded to believe? Can they really be trusted?

I suppose Mormonism and Scientology stand out because they are the most modern (and obvious) scams going.

economist | February 2, 2008, 1:10pm | #

"Also, since they have the added distinction of being part of a religious minority that's viewed with disdain by the larger Christian population, they don't tend to hassle anyone much about religion".

Although I'm not really a true believer, I still get pissed when some teetotaling, obnoxious Baptist or fundie rips on Catholics for having "bizarre doctrines". I know that transubstantiation, venerating saints, and purgatory are somewhat "out there" but is it more bizarre than believing that if you accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior you can be as big a douche as you want and still go straight to the big (in Baptist theology, non-drinking) party in the sky? This is probably why I don't identify myself as a religious person.

prolefeed | February 2, 2008, 2:18pm | #

It takes a startling ability to not think things through to believe that Jospeph Smith was a charlatan who made up a bunch of lies in the Book of Mormon and sold it to the credulous, and yet still believe that the Old and New Testaments are absolutely the inerrant word of God and that none of the many, many people who wrote this stuff down were making any of it up.

Someone Who Doesn't Want to Lose His Job | February 2, 2008, 2:44pm | #

prolefeed
They are pretty similar cases, true. People get way too much mileage out of the "recent = wrong, ancient = right" business. If it's unbelievable, it's unbelievable, regardless of when it was written.

economist | February 2, 2008, 3:34pm | #

Helen Mar Kimball
I see absolutely nothing wrong with telling women that I talked to God if it makes them want to have sex with me. Of course, I would also tell them God wants her to use contraceptives. I don't want to be responsible for any kids with her DNA.

Roger | February 2, 2008, 3:42pm | #

Jason Raimondo: I was beginning to think I wouldn't see you post around here since you mistakenly thought Matt Welch wrote for Suck.com. How embarrassing. Welcome back!

J sub D | February 2, 2008, 4:48pm | #

It takes a startling ability to not think things through to believe that Jospeph Smith was a charlatan who made up a bunch of lies in the Book of Mormon and sold it to the credulous, and yet still believe that the Old and New Testaments are absolutely the inerrant word of God and that none of the many, many people who wrote this stuff down were making any of it up.

Agreed. It's all nonsense. But what can you do?

J sub D | February 2, 2008, 4:52pm | #

Dagnabit. I was certain I put the [i] tags in that post.
Preview, dummy. Preview.

whit | February 2, 2008, 9:39pm | #

regardless of the "interesting" aspects of mormon doctrine, i have to agree with the posters here in that the mormons i have met (in the dozens) have been on the whole some pretty cool people. they do tend to be a bit "squarer" than the average joe. that's not necessarily a bad thing. also, there's a running joke in law enforcement circles that the FBI tends to hire a lot of "mormon accountants from Utah" because they so easily fit into their ultra square organizational zeitgeist. contrast with DEA/ATF.

i think the point of the article is pretty silly in that romney is so much like so many other mormons i know. iow, they don't act wacky.

they also seem to do really well in all sorts of competitions - dance contests, singing contests, etc. for some reason.


in a "good neighbor" analysis, it's pretty clear that they are among the most law abiding group in the US (right up there with japanese americans) in terms of very low involvement in what the more PC refer to as "social pathologies". their crime rate, crime victimization rate, and all that stuff is very low.

midbrowcrisis | February 3, 2008, 2:55am | #

Interesting article, but every Mormon I've met was decidedly less strange than the religion itself. Every one of them was kind of ubernormal. (Then again, I guess if you break down each religion and all the crazy stuff in them, you could make similar claims about all or most of them - that the adherents are usually less strange than the religions themselves. Maybe zen is the exception as I've met some really truly whacky zen Buddhists but zen strikes me as fairly reasonable - just pay attention, don't make judgements, be here now blah blah blah).

"Militant polyamory." Now that's my kind of militantism.

JNR | February 3, 2008, 3:42pm | #

I watched a Romney vid that almost convinced me to vote for him. He defended that same criticism that Walker levels at him for not being 'mormon enough.' Interestingly, I found his response (in this particular moment) to be incredibly even handed and libertarian. But then again, the LDS faith does contain a few libertarian tenets.

One of mormonism's primary articles of belief is the concept that free will is absolutely vital, and a necessary right for all people in all situations. So while mormons personally believe in very strict rules of personal conduct, Romney stated that he believed it would be wrong to impose those rules by law.

But then he made a fool of himself in other situations, as with the two youtube clips posted by Pig Mannix.

Most well-informed mormons would admit up-front that their religion is either completely true or completely fraudulent. As a mormon who tries to stay well-informed, I'm well aware of this situation. Our beliefs are extremely weird and peculiar, and if it wasn't for some very personal experiences, I wouldn't believe a word of it. And so naturally, I believe that there should always be a total separation of church and state. I think Romney agrees with that position in some ways, too bad he's a idiot in so many others.

prolefeed | February 3, 2008, 4:54pm | #

Most well-informed mormons would admit up-front that their religion is either completely true or completely fraudulent. As a mormon who tries to stay well-informed, I'm well aware of this situation. Our beliefs are extremely weird and peculiar, and if it wasn't for some very personal experiences, I wouldn't believe a word of it.

As a very recently minted ex-Mormon, I found that, as much as I liked the people in my ward, I couldn't keep attending, and in particular teaching classes about stuff I thought was interesting but false.

I think the kindest possible interpretation of the First Vision and the subsequent events of Joseph Smith's life, short of thinking it actually happened, is that Joseph Smith ate some magic mushrooms in those woods and hallucinated and believed he really was ordained to start this new religion.

Anyone know whether magic mushrooms grow in New York state?